Three possible answers: 1. research shows that cycling Semax is necessary; 2. research shows that cycling Semax is unnecessary; 3. we don't know yet because we don't have enough research.
Three possible answers: 1. research shows that cycling Semax is necessary; 2. research shows that cycling Semax is unnecessary; 3. we don't know yet because we don't have enough research.
I'm not stating anything! I'm simply asking you whether there is research showing that cycling is necessary to prevent some kind of downregulation? Or, can we just take it indefinitely?
Three possible answers: 1. research shows that cycling Semax is necessary; 2. research shows that cycling Semax is unnecessary; 3. we don't know yet because we don't have enough research.
Which is correct?
"3 possible answers" lol no.
Already told you, there's different benefits to cycling vs acute usage & off days
Research does not show cycling is necessary, so looks like you've done none
It's prescribed for longterm use in Russia
I'm not stating anything! I'm simply asking you whether there is research showing that cycling is necessary to prevent some kind of downregulation? Or, can we just take it indefinitely?